AI Models

Claude Haiku 4.5 vs Sonnet 4.5: Complete Comparison (2026)

Choosing between Claude Haiku 4.5 and Sonnet 4.5 comes down to a fundamental trade-off: raw speed and cost efficiency versus depth of reasoning and output quality. Here's everything you need to make the right decision in 2026.

Quick Answer: Haiku 4.5 is fastest and cheapest — ideal for high-volume, simpler tasks. Sonnet 4.5 delivers better reasoning and higher-quality output — ideal for content, code, and complex analysis. Most serious production applications use Sonnet 4.5.

Model Comparison at a Glance

FeatureClaude Haiku 4.5Claude Sonnet 4.5
SpeedFastestFast
Output QualityGoodExcellent
ReasoningModerateHigh
Cost per TokenLowestModerate
Context Window200K tokens200K tokens
Extended ThinkingLimitedFull support
Best ForHigh-volume, simple tasksComplex tasks, production content

When to Use Claude Haiku 4.5

Haiku 4.5 is Anthropic's fastest, most cost-effective model in the 4.x generation. It excels at tasks where speed and throughput matter more than depth:

  • Real-time applications and chatbots with high concurrency
  • Classification, tagging, and routing tasks at scale
  • Short summarisation of structured content
  • Data extraction from well-formatted documents
  • Applications with very high API call volumes where cost is the primary constraint

When to Use Claude Sonnet 4.5

Sonnet 4.5 is the sweet spot for most production applications in 2026. It delivers meaningfully better reasoning and output quality than Haiku without the cost of Opus:

  • Writing high-quality blog posts, landing pages, and marketing copy
  • Code generation, review, and debugging
  • Complex multi-step reasoning and analysis
  • Research synthesis and report writing
  • Customer-facing applications where output quality reflects on your brand
  • Agentic tasks with extended thinking

Use Case Breakdown

Haiku 4.5 Wins

  • Support ticket classification
  • Batch data extraction
  • Simple FAQ chatbots
  • Real-time moderation
  • High-volume translation

Sonnet 4.5 Wins

  • Website and content generation
  • Code generation and review
  • Long-form writing tasks
  • Document analysis
  • Autonomous agent workflows

The Extended Thinking Difference

One of the most significant differences between these models in 2026 is how they handle extended thinking — the ability to "think through" a problem before responding. Sonnet 4.5 has full support for extended thinking with substantial thinking budgets, enabling much deeper reasoning on hard problems. Haiku 4.5's extended thinking capabilities are more limited.

If your use case requires the model to work through complex logic, generate structured plans, or reason about ambiguous problems, Sonnet 4.5 is the better choice.

The Practical Decision Framework

Start with these questions:

  1. Does output quality directly affect your users or customers? If yes, use Sonnet 4.5.
  2. Are you running more than 10,000 API calls per day? Evaluate whether Haiku's cost savings justify the quality trade-off.
  3. Is your task primarily classification, extraction, or routing? Haiku 4.5 is likely sufficient.
  4. Does your task require reasoning, writing, or code? Use Sonnet 4.5.

How ChilledSites Uses These Models

ChilledSites uses Claude Sonnet for all customer-facing website generation and AI editing — because the quality of those outputs is what our users judge us by. Background processing, routing, and internal classification tasks may use lighter models where the quality bar is lower.

The approach reflects a broader principle: match model capability to task stakes. Don't over-spend on simple tasks, and don't under-invest where quality matters.

See Sonnet-Quality Websites Live

ChilledSites uses Anthropic's Claude models to generate professional websites in under 60 seconds. Try it yourself — from £29/year.

Build Your Website with AI